AR5, IPCC & The United Nations

I am linking to Watt’s Up With That because of the considerable material and discussion concerning the recently leaked AR5 2^nd Draft Paper at the site. 

I salute the leaker, by the way.  The IPCC will now be obliged to honour many statements they have previously made but circumvented about openness and transparency with regard to their dealings and reports. 

The time is nigh for intelligent leaders of nations to kick the United Nations to the kerb and deny them further funding.  Unintelligent leaders will, of course, kowtow to the UN, fawn to the Green Mafia and continue to send them buckets of money.  Australia is afflicted with such lack of intelligence in the form of the Gillard Government.

Remember, the United Nations want to control the Internet.  I think they will seriously pull every rabbit they can out of the hat now after release of the IPCC’s draft report.  I have no doubt they will make it their mission to ensure free speech is killed one way or another.   By the way, I wonder if our man Stephen Conroy, Minister for Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy and pusher of the Mandatory Internet Filter voted with the intelligent nations against Big UN Brother as the US, Europe and Canada have or did Australia vote with Middle Eastern and communist countries who want the Internet controlled?  I can’t wait to find out!

The United Nations are getting too big for their boots.  They are not the Government of the World.  Yet!

WUWT TV

On November 14th and 15th, 2012 Anthony Watts (Watts Up With That?) presented a 24 hour counter broadcast to that of the slick presentation of Al Gore's "24 hours of Climate Reality" (caveat emptor).

Mr. Watts is now in the process of releasing his 24 hour broadcasts and I will repost them as they appear.

Here is the first segment - an interview with US Senator Inhofe.

Time To Abandon The UN

So  Muslim community leaders are about to lobby the United Nations to outlaw blasphemy now!  For heaven’s sake, where is this rubbish going to end?

“Human rights are not about protecting religions; human rights are to protect humans,” Radsch said. “Who is going to be the decision-maker on deciding what blasphemy is?”

http://www.smh.com.au/world/push-to-call-blasphemy-a-crime-20120922-26dlu.html

Courtney C. Radsch - who is program manager for the Global Freedom of Expression Campaign is absolutely right of course and should we even be placing trust in the UN to get such a definition right?  I don’t believe so.

The UN should not get their grubby little fingers stuck into curtailing global free speech because some Muslims regularly like to over-excite themselves.  Where will it all stop if they are permitted to get away with dictating which religions should be protected and which should not?

For the record, I am an atheist and treat all religions with equal disdain!

Let’s take this a step further.  What has the UN successfully done to rein in Muslim killing sprees – particularly with regard to attacks upon those who follow religions other than Islam?

I’ve had a serious problem accepting the UN as a competent, balanced body. It is devoid of credibility, in my opinion.  Their track-record is pretty deplorable, when you think about it.

I believe Australia, along with other democracies who continue to fund the UN should seriously consider whether this is money well spent.  I deplore waste!