I'm grumpy. I'm tired and I am just about anti-everything! However, I do enjoy a good rant.
Wednesday, 9 January 2013
ASIC Raids Moylan's Campsite
Meanwhile, over at the ABC's online website - they report on the Australian Securities & Investments Commisiion's involvement today. However, there seems to be an absence of any mention of the "involvement" of the Greens Senators Rhiannon and Milne's public support of the criminal actions of Jonathan Moylan. I wonder why that is? Some facts reported. Others concealed. Our ABC - fair, balanced and unbiased reporting yet again!
..................................................................
ASIC raids Whitehaven hoaxer's campsite
Updated 1 hour 15 minutes ago
The man at the centre of the Whitehaven coal hoax says the corporate regulator has raided his camp in northern New South Wales and taken his phone and computer.
Jonathan Moylan, from Frontline Action Coal, issued a fake ANZ media release claiming the bank had pulled a $1.2 billion loan from Whitehaven's Maules Creek project on environmental grounds.
The Australian Securities and Investments Commission is considering legal action after $314 million was temporarily wiped from the value of the company.
Many investors lost up to 9 per cent of the value of their shares by selling on media reports based on the fake release, before the share price recovered after Whitehaven and ANZ confirmed the release was a hoax.
Mr Moylan says ASIC raided his camp at the Maules Creek coal project near Boggabri in northern New South Wales.
"ASIC did turn up at the camp and, unfortunately I don't know exactly how much I'm allowed to say about that because there are offences for revealing details of an ASIC investigation, but I can say I've been required to attend questioning and they've seized my phone and computer," he told Radio National Breakfast.
The 24 year old environment activist says he is more concerned about the environmental impact on the local community than his own welfare.
"There may be very, very serious consequences for me that's going to affect only me," he said.
"The real on the ground impact going to be felt by the local community here is much more at the top of my mind.
"These projects are continuing to be approved and generating the biggest crisis that humanity faces."
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2013-01-09/asic-raids-whitehaven-hoaxers-campsite/4457698
The Morally Bankrupt Australian Greens
Another example of the repugnant and morally bankrupt
Australian Greens Party. Not content to
simply create mayhem with regard to Australia’s border control via importation
of boatloads of illegal entrants (who immediately affix themselves to the public teat, form
ghettos that, in many cases, become no-go zones, even for law enforcement
officers and show an unwillingness to assimilate into Australian society and
Australian way of life.) The Greens are
also driving Australia’s prosperity into the ground via useless and
ill-conceived CAGW schemes, they now
clearly show they have no intention of upholding Australian law.
The Australian Greens are in coalition with Labor
ensuring the Gillard Regime would have the numbers to govern along with help
from several Independents. An
unspeakable three-year disaster for this Nation.
Sinclair Davidson is correct. Financial arson has been committed by
Jonathan Moylan.
Reblogged from Catallaxy Files.
Australia's
leading libertarian and centre-right blog
Financial arson
5 comments
How to characterise what Jonathan Moylan did?
Well the Greens are trying to
run a ‘civil disobedience‘ line.
THE
Greens leader, Senator Christine Milne, has endorsed a controversial hoax by an
anti-coal activist, saying his actions were ”part of a long and proud history
of civil disobedience, potentially breaking the law, to highlight something
wrong”.
Her comments came after a
tweet by her colleague Lee Rhiannon, who publicly congratulated Jonathan
Moylan, an activist under scrutiny for impersonating a bank and temporarily
wiping $314 million off the value of Whitehaven Coal.
”Congrats to Jonathan Moylan, Frontline Action on Coal, for exposing ANZ investment in coalmines,” Ms Rhiannon tweeted on Tuesday night.
”Congrats to Jonathan Moylan, Frontline Action on Coal, for exposing ANZ investment in coalmines,” Ms Rhiannon tweeted on Tuesday night.
Okay
– good luck with that. I’m not convinced myself but it does leave the Greens
having to explain why destroying economic prosperity and shareholder value is
for the ‘good’. Having destroyed the Tasmanian economy they are turning their
sights onto the mainland.
Conversely Nikki Williams from
the Australian Coal Association has an excellent op-ed in the Australian.
The
deliberate and fraudulent manipulation of the stockmarket is a serious offence,
which undermines confidence in Australia’s investment system.
I
disagree with two sentences.
Contempt
for the interests of the public is an unusual face for the activist movement.
No.
Ask the Tasmanian logging industry about that.
Free
speech is a right that must be protected, but with free speech must come
responsibility and accountability.
This is not a free speech issue. Moylan should be
free to tell us all about the evils of coal mining and how it is disgraceful
that ANZ is lending them money and, if he were an ANZ shareholder, turn up at
the AGM and ask tough questions etc. etc. etc. In fact, Moylan is free to do
all those things already.
Moylan did not say what he liked, he did what he liked. Moylan committed an act
of violence against Whitehaven’s shareholders and the integrity of the
Australian financial markets – so every person in Australia who has direct
investments or indirect investments like superannuation.
If he
had set a forest fire we would immediately recognise the wrong – he did the
financial equivalent.
.....................................................................
More about this disgusting saga at Michael Smith News.
.....................................................................
More about this disgusting saga at Michael Smith News.
Monday, 7 January 2013
Not A Good Look - ABC!
Judith Sloan at Catallaxy makes a good case with regard to our taxpayer-funded Lefty-supporting ABC. It’s definitely a closed shop and of the opinion it is above some avenues of FOI disclosure. We are talking about the public interest. I think we have a right to know what the likes of Faine (who is the subject of a Complaint lodged by me recently to the ABC's Audience & Consumer Affairs arm. Remember – the ABC self-adjudicates, so I am expecting great results in relation to that Complaint!
The ABC avoids extraneous inquisition and considering its activity in mainstream media on a number of levels, that’s not good enough in 2012/13. Go Judith!
Reblogged from Catallaxy.
………………………………………………………………….
Knowing the remuneration package of Tony Jones/Jon Faine,
etc.
It is
quite a few years since I was on the board of the ABC – yes, I know what you
are thinking. Fat lot of good you did, Judith. And you are probably
right.
But I
just love the current efforts of the ABC to resist any meaningful disclosure of
the pay packages of the top earning ABC ‘talent’. I hesistate to use the
term worker or employee; certainly, in my day, quite a lot of the ‘talent’ was
employed through service companies, which also employed members of their
families. Even as a board member, it was difficult to extract any real
information about the remuneration arrangements and levels of the radio and
television presenters.
And
yes, employing these people through service companies did probably make the ABC
party to a form of tax avoidance, although the presenters would declare that
they didn’t have any right of tenure as most ABC employees do. Mind you,
I always thought that a number of these presenters were engaging in a high
degree of hypocrisy by publicly banging on about the evils of individual
contracts and WorkChoices while taking full advantage of individual contracts
themselves.
THE
ABC could be forced to disclose details of the pay packets of its top
broadcasters and producers at programs such as Media Watch, Four Corners and
Mornings with Jon Faine after it lost two appeals to block access to the
information.
The
national broadcaster received $1 billion in government funding in the last
financial year and spent $486 million on wages and superannuation.
But
the ABC does not want to provide a breakdown of who its biggest earners are.
The
network lost its most recent appeal just before Christmas when the
Administrative Appeals Tribunal ruled against it, rejecting the ABC’s arguments
and saying some evidence it had put forward was not relevant and “of little
assistance”.
A
Freedom of Information request was lodged more than two years ago by the Herald
and Weekly Times, seeking access to documents “dealing with salaries, or any
payments” paid to program makers working on 13 programs, including those listed
above, for the financial year ending 2010.
The
ABC refused to hand over the documents, which include individual employment
contracts, Australian Workplace Agreements, Individual Transitional Employment
Agreements, pay slips and other “payment records”.
According
to the ABC’s annual report for the 2012 financial year, 401 employees earned
more than $150,000 each – an increase from 312 the previous year.
The
ABC employs the equivalent of 4603 full-time employees.
You
really have to laugh. According to the ABC Annual Report:
The ABC recognises its
responsibility to the Australian people as a publicly-funded broadcaster, and adopts high standards of corporate governance.
Really? If it were to adopt
high standards of corporate governance, it would not be fudging its remeration
report, which is pretty much what was required of companies 15 years ago.
All that can be found out are the earnings of the top six officers within
bands and note that the term ‘officers’ excludes all presenters.
And
openness and transparency as part of high standards of corporate
governance? I don’t think so. Take these statements from the Annual
Report.
The Freedom of Information Act 1982 (“FOI Act”) gives the public the
right to access documents held by the ABC. During the past year, the ABC
received 30 requests for access to documents under the FOI Act. One request was
granted, four were granted in part, 20 were refused and one was withdrawn. Four
requests were still being processed at the end of the financial year. Of the 20 requests
which were refused, 16 were outside the scope of the FOI Act. Part IIof Schedule 2 of the FOI Act
specifically excludes documents relating to the ABC’s program material from the
operation of the FOI Act.
Prior to the launch of the
revised ABC Editorial Policies in April 2011 (see page 85),
the ABC Editorial Policies included an aim to respond to
complaints within 28 days. Between 1 July 2010 and 30 June 2011, ABC Audience
and Consumer Affairs responded directly to 17 241 audience contacts.Of these,
11 833 (68.6%) received responseswithin 28 days.
In
other words, use every excuse under the sun to withhold information from FOI
requests and dither away while ‘handling’ complaints. (Recall the
Finkelstein suggestion that complaints be handled within days … sure.) Note
also that less than 10 per cent of complaints are ‘upheld’.
I had
also forgotten what an incredibly SELF-CONGRATULATORY organisation the ABC
is. If anything, it seems worse than it was during my tenure on the
board. (Incidentally, the staff’s attitude to the board was completely
dismissive, along the lines … well, you are here for a short time, we are here
for ever, so we will ignore you.)
The Strategic Plan 2010 –13 commits the ABC to striving to
maintain its leadership position as aninnovative and independent media
organisationserving the needs of all Australians. It sets out six high-level
strategic goals for the ABC:
Audience focused—to provide a range of mediaexperiences to meet the needs and
expectations of diverse audiences
High quality—to consistently deliver content which reflects the ABC’s
commitment to quality, independence and high editorial standards
Innovative—to pursue new ideas, opportunities and partnerships, and grow
our capabilities for the future
Values based—to demonstrate ABC Values in every aspect of our work
Efficient—to maximise the efficient and effective use of resources
Responsible—to be visible and active in the community, setting high
standards of social,environmental and regulatory responsibility.
But here’s the rub – WHEN THE ABC MARKS ITSELF ON
THESE CRITERIA (sub-categories, included), THERE IS NOT ONE AREA IN WHICH IT
DOES NOT REGARD ITS PERFORMANCE AS EITHER SATISFACTORY OR
OUTSTANDING. I am
not making this up.
Where
do you begin?
Another thought – gross misrepresentation by the ABC in its Annual Report.
“In
real terms, the ABC’s operational revenue has declined over time.”
Actually,
not since 1997-98, it has not. And there were special reasons for the
high figures in the mid 1980s.
And
note the use of operational revenue. The government is for ever kicking
in extras here and there, including of coure the now uncontestible Australia
Network, which are not counted as operational revenue.
Labels:
ABC,
FOI,
Law-unto-Self,
Sell It Off,
Tony
Suspect Global Warming Tales: 2013 - No. 2
Like a bull camel in musk with a gob full of foam and
lips-a-flapping, we have the Australian Conservation Foundation’s Programme
Manager, Tony Mohr scaring the bejesus out of the chooks at the ABC’s online
website, The Drum.
Tony, dear fellow – this is Australia, one of the hottest
places on the Planet and not called “a sunburnt country” for nothing. I thought we were not supposed to confuse
weather with climate! Oh! Nevermind - I must have my wires crossed
again! We’ve lived through heatwaves
before, you know and we are bound to live through them again. Heatwaves in Australia are not a new
phenomena – although I think you would like to assume your readers are a little
bit stupid. You need to do a bit of
research on the influences of la Nina and el Nino weather patterns and perhaps
take a bit of a look at that bloody big and hot Star we call the Sun and how it
influences weather and climate on Earth.
Flares and spots – that sort of stuff.
Here’s Tony liberally spreading his foam in part. You can click on the link below, if you are
fit enough to stomach the diatribe.
Australia is in the midst of a heat wave. In
and of itself, that's nothing special, but it is getting hotter. What we do
today will dictate how hot we are tomorrow, writes Tony Mohr.
Chances are that as you read this, if you're not in Sydney, you're
either sweating uncomfortably or sitting in an air-conditioned office.
It's probably somewhere between 35 and 40 degrees Celsius outside.
More if you're in one of Australia's hotter regional areas. You probably had a
fitful night's sleep.
We all know the symptoms; Australia is in the midst of a heat
wave.
In and of itself, that's nothing special. We have heatwaves all
the time. But it is getting hotter. Climate change is making things worse. What
Australia - and the world - is seeing is weather on steroids.
No-one can point to any given hot day and say categorically that
'it is hot because of climate change'. No-one is trying to. But we know very
well that as the climate heats up, it makes the chances of a day being hot
greater, and it makes the likely maximum temperature even hotter.
We can't look at Lance Armstrong's career and say "that stage
win on Alpe d'Huez was because of doping". But we can say "doping was
absolutely a factor in him winning seven straight Tours de France".
Likewise, we know climate change is a factor in the increasing number of hot
days and nights we are experiencing in Australia, even if the cause of any
given hot day is ambiguous.
According to the National Climate Data Centre, nine of the 10
hottest years on record have been since 2000 (the other is 1998), and of the
hottest 20 years on record - that is, since 1880 - the earliest is 1987, which
comes in at 20.
Last year in the US, heat records were broken with distressing
regularity. In an ordinary year, the ratio of hot-weather records to
cold-weather records is roughly equal. In 2012, for every cold-weather record,
there were 3.5 record hot days.
The CSIRO has
found Australian annual average daily maximum temperatures have steadily
increased in the last hundred years, with most of the warming trend occurring
since 1970. There has been an increase in the number of hot days and a decrease
in the number of cold days. 2012 has been announced the ninth-hottest year on
record.
Please take note at paragraph 9 of this foaming essay as it
is relevant to my previous post involving the detective work undertaken by
Anthony Watts and relating to records and their potential for some creative
manipulation.
CSIRO, please note – we are coming out of the Little Ice
Age, you know! I would say a bit of
warming is natural and to be expected.
Of course, I am blindly assuming your data is accurate.
The CSIRO is another body attached to the public teat that
requires a good looking into.
Get your umbrellas up and follow the bouncing ball here:-
So - July 2012 Was NOT Hottest Month In US History
Anthony Watts (WUWT) has done a bit of detective work! On the surface, it appears NOAA keeps two
sets of books. One book is kept by the
National Climate Data Centre and the other with data fed to the press is kept by State of the Climate (SOTC) See below:
“Climate Highlights — July
The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during July was 77.6°F, 3.3°F above the 20th century average, marking the warmest July and all-time warmest month on record for the nation in a period of record that dates back to 1895. The previous warmest July for the nation was July 1936, when the average U.S. temperature was 77.4°F.”
The average temperature for the contiguous U.S. during July was 77.6°F, 3.3°F above the 20th century average, marking the warmest July and all-time warmest month on record for the nation in a period of record that dates back to 1895. The previous warmest July for the nation was July 1936, when the average U.S. temperature was 77.4°F.”
NCDC’s record shows 76.9 deg.F for July, 2012 but the SOTC figure released to the
press and an unsuspecting public was 77.6 deg.F.
Anthony Watts found not one discrepancy but many.
Surely, there has to be a simple explanation for SOTC's creative inflation of the figures.
Right?
There are accusations that the British Met Office plays
loosely with the truth and we suspect BOM may very well behave in the same
vein.
You would expect common decency would override fraudulent
behaviour to support a cause, but then again we are dealing with group-think,
snouts and deep troughs – and taxpayers footing the bills! Not one of us should lose sight of the billions upon billions wasted propping green planet-saving schemes plus useless taxes that simply drive every product out of the reach of just about everyone. Look at our electricity hikes, with another 10% increase due this month! It's ridiculous. So few having so much global influence based on absolutely suspect data spewed out of suspect computer models.
What disturbs me is this story of the hottest US July on
record was reported widely across the globe with the usual hyperventilating and
finger-pointing. From memory, I think
it was used by some of our own High Priests to hammer home the gospel according
to the Church of Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Here’s the direct link to Anthony Watts’ post as it is long,
containing graphs, charts and varification links. I hope he takes his findings to the highest level and makes good
use of the US Data Quality Act.
Saturday, 5 January 2013
Suspect Global Warming Tales: 2013 - No. 1
This year, I intend to shine the odd spotlight on planet
cooking propaganda pieces written by hyperventilating, wheelbarrow-pushing
journalists. A practice currently rife
in some sectors of our not-so-balanced mainstream media.
Last year, there were a number of examples of Press Release
Journalism covering the subject of Global Warming, (GW) Dangerous Global
Warming (DAGW) or straight-out Catastrophic Anthropogenic Global Warming (CAGW)
that were drip-fed to unsuspecting viewers or readers without due diligence
applied to research of the subject,
fact-checking, corrections where applicable or follow-up reports. I believe it is the duty of responsible
bloggers to open up the windows and let in some light and fresh air. We can no longer rely on mainstream media to
simply report the facts. There’s too
much spin out there.
Having opened up a Suspect Global Warming Tales File, I’ll
begin 2013 with this delightful article appearing on the ABC website that is
bound to scare the stuffing out of you if you are one of those people who
believe the anthropogenic planet cooking spin without question because the
Government tells you the science is settled, when clearly it’s not and the
planet is heating up at an unprecedented rate when it’s not. A lovely example of journalistic engineering which is a bit
similar to social engineering from our wonderful, reliably accurate,
taxpayer-funded, unbiased and balanced ABC.!
MIA – a reporter interested in evidence and has experience with
fact-checkers and how they work. See
below for link.
Jellyfish numbers on the rise, expert says
A marine stinger researcher says there has been a disturbing
increase in jellyfish numbers around Australia.
Dr Lisa Gershwin has confirmed the deadly irukandji was
responsible for several recent attacks off Fraser Island in south-east
Queensland.
Two men were stung and hospitalised on Wednesday while
swimming on the western side of the island.
A five-year-old boy was stung in the same area on New Year's
Day.
Dr Gershwin says there have been huge, unexplained jellyfish
blooms across the country.
"All over the country we were seeing unseasonably large
blooms of jellyfish and we don't know exactly what is causing these blooms
because we don't have enough data," she said.
She says there is a lot of good overseas research about the
causes of jellyfish blooms.
"It tends to be things like over fishing, climate
change pollution too much fertiliser and too much sewage in the coastal
waters," she said.
……………………………………………..
Meanwhile, a peer-reviewed study appearing in the most
recent issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Science (PNAS manuscript #
2012-10920R). has been released in collaboration with the University of
Southampton which appears to refute some of what Dr Lisa Gershwin had to say.
Thanks to WUWT
for the heads-up with regard to this Paper.
Too bad the writer of this ABC piece didn’t bother to question our very
own Marine Researcher, Dr Gershwin regarding this Paper although she admits
“there is a lot of good overseas research about the causes of jellyfish
blooms.” Nope – the trusty scribe just
went with the flow! But who am I to
speculate as to any perceived motives on behalf of the journalist in
question? I’m just an interested
observer who is not always given the facts by the ABC and Fairfax Media. And that annoys me!
This paragraph from the Paper:-
The key finding of the study shows global jellyfish
populations undergo concurrent fluctuations with successive decadal periods of
rise and fall, including a rising phase in the 1990s and early 2000s that has
contributed to the current perception of a global increase in jellyfish
abundance. The previous period of high jellyfish numbers during the 1970s went
unnoticed due to limited research on jellyfish at the time, less awareness of
global-scale problems and a lower capacity for information sharing (e.g. no
Internet).
And...
Increased speculation and discrepancies about current and
future jellyfish blooms by the media and in climate and science reports formed
the motivation for the study. “There are major consequences for getting the
answer correct for tourism, fisheries and management decisions as they relate
to climate change and changing ocean environments,” says Dr Lucas. “The
important aspect about our work is that we have provided the long-term baseline
backed with all data available to science, which will enable scientists to
build on and eventually repeat these analyses in a decade or two from now to
determine whether there has been a real increase in jellyfish.”
Tuesday, 1 January 2013
The Deceitful Mr Swan
The following article defies credibility. That is, it won’t get past those of us who
follow this rancid Government closely.
Swan’s hypocrisy and sheer gutlessness to accept responsibility for Labor’s utter ineptitude is breath-taking. The absolute gormlessness of Swan and his cohorts is reminiscent of episodes of Laurel and Hardy. I have great fears, however, that the majority of Australia’s voting public may read reports such as this without applying a minute of scrutiny to the dishonest spin. Worse, they may well swallow the deceit without question!
I watch Parliament Question Time the majority of the days
the House of Representatives sit. I
have noted, during the 2012 Parliamentary sitting days that the vitriol Mr Swan
alludes to comes from the Government, itself.
The haranguing, smearing and misrepresentation of the truth ladled out by the Gillard Government via constant assault on the Opposition, has not escaped my observation.
Perhaps this government and indeed, some of the Lef-tard electorate
and Left-leaning journalists, (see Fairfax Media and taxpayer-funded Socialist-sympathetic ABC) have overlooked the
role of the Opposition and what that entails.
A third-grader could enlighten them – but what’s the point of wasting a
third-grader’s time when you are dealing with Fundamentalist Socialists who are
prepared to go to any lengths to hang onto power? And that’s where it gets dangerous. Very dangerous, because nothing is sacred. Just wait for the PM’s media jihadist (John
McTernan on a 457 visa) to cut loose as
we approach an Election.
If you thought ex Qld Premier, Anna Bligh’s personal attacks
on LNP leader Campbell Newman were repulsive during last year’s lead up to the
QLD State Election, well folks – fasten your seatbelts… and I’m sure you all
know the rest of that famous Bette Davis line. With McTernan conducting the orchestra leading up to the 2013
Federal Election, we have no idea what is about to befall us. I just hope Australian voters posses a
modicum of savvy and treat the flood of lies with the contempt they will so
richly deserve.
Australia has not really experienced filthy politics. We are in for a vulgar awakening in 2013.
Swan is right in one area, voters have, indeed, been turned
off by this Government’s continued blame-game.
It’s Tony Abbott’s fault;
Abbott-Abbott-Abbott. Over and
over and over again.
The fact that these hoons cannot concentrate on anything
other than the Opposition leader shows how deeply Abbott has got under their
skin. Ministers, Albanese, Combet, Plibersek,
Roxon, Shorten, Swan and of course, the misandrist, PM Julia Gillard herself
have had a field day Abbotting rather than accepting responsibility for their
abject incompetence. Not to forget the screeching voice of Minister Macklin as she attempts vainly to kick a Government goal. Roll out Senators
Penny Wong and Stephen Conroy for their own honourable mention, too. I don’t think I’ve heard one address from Wong
that hasn’t been riddled with the Abbott word. All of them repugnant blots on what should be a crisp and clean page.
Anyone capable of thinking for themselves and able to
fact-check the spin should be rightly disgusted with and distrustful of the
Gillard Government’s 2012 Parliamentary performance.
To say I am repulsed by the Gillard Government is an
understatement. How she assumed that
role is simply outrageous. As a person
who has been exposed as somebody having very little moral fibre or fortitude
and I refer to the AWU/Gillard gate scandal which I have covered previously,
it’s insulting to this nation that she has led it for the past three
years. The fact that this woman seems
to be pretty loose with the truth is deeply concerning.
Throughout 2012 everything under the sun has been Abbott’s
fault, according to this Socialist regime.
They cannot and will not accept responsibility for their own sheer
incompetence. And there is plenty of
that on record. The NBN White elephant;
the pink batt farce that ended up burning some homes to the ground and killed
people; the school sheds project – millions of dollars frittered away whilst
Australia’s education standards rating slipped to about No. 27 on a worldwide
comparison chart.
E-gad – these
Socialist things think they are up to the task of running a country? The only task they are up to is propagating
deceit. Deceit perpetrated on the
Australian public.
I am counting down the weeks Australia must endure these
fools. Fools who have smashed and
wasted the contents of the piggy bank former Liberal Treasurer, Peter Costello
had carefully established. They have
flung and continue to fling bribes into the electorate in the hope they will
win back the stupids. You can’t get any
more brazen or stupid than that with money that belongs to the Australian
taxpayer.
Roll on the Election.
Australia has to rid itself of these parasites if it has any hope of
survival. We have not fought wars to
hand over our democracy to wankers with a definite agenda. The Rudd/Gillard support of the pathetically
inept and I am convinced, less than
honest and sincere United Nations. They
are in the business of appointing despots to head UN committees and the like,
you know. If you want to argue in
favour of the United Nations then please be my guest and present the UN’s
scorecard listing their so-called peace mission successes over the past 20
years. Then list the conflicts they
have ‘allegedly’ had jurisdiction over during the same time period. OK – I rest my case!. The UN has their own agenda they are
pushing and Australian taxpayers have significantly increased the level of
sponsorship to the rogue United Nations under this band of Socialist
idiots. How surprising? Splash!
Where did those mega-millions go?
This is not a joking matter.
Meanwhile China owns us as our massive borrowings continue
to balloon and the mega-dollar debt service rises daily.
If people scoff at the suggestion Australia won’t end up
like Greece then I have these words for you:
You have no idea what’s around the fiscal corner. Trust me – it won’t be a pretty landscape
watercolour. It’s going to be very ugly
and will last a number of years.
Yes, I acknowledge this could be deemed a fair rant but I
cannot express my utmost revulsion as to what has happened to Australia when we
had everything to gain with an unprecedented mining boom and a reasonably
healthy manufacturing industry happening during most of the tenure of these
morons. To see everything pissed up
against the wall by Socialist incompetents is an utter insult to a thinking
Australian. It is going to take decades
to extract Australia from the absolute mire these incompetents have
belly-flopped us into.
I hope to never again see a Federal Labor Government in my
lifetime!
I know I’ve got off the subject of the goose, Australian
Treasurer, Wayne Swan but really, what else can you do but laugh at the
fool. We know he cannot balance the
country’s books to save his seat and I am sure we will be informed of the
horrific mess Swan has left the country in once some adults take charge.
.........................................................................
Don't blame us: Swan on vitriol
December 31, 201
Jacqueline Maley
Parliamentary Sketch Writer for the Sydney Morning Herald
THE Gillard government bears no responsibility for the
negative and vitriolic tone of the political debate in 2012, says Treasurer
Wayne Swan.
He admits the ''scrappy'' political year turned many voters
off politics but denies the government contributed to bitter partisanship that
defined it.
''I don't concede that the government has been behind
personal attacks,'' he said. ''We want to have a policy discussion based on the
facts, not on the aggressive negativity, particularly the likes of which we've
seen from Tony Abbott … to say that's a personal attack on Tony Abbott, given
the events of last year, I find quite extraordinary.''
This year, Prime Minister Julia Gillard labelled Opposition
Leader Mr Abbott a misogynist, Health Minister Nicola Roxon said he had an
''issue with capable women'', and Mr Swan called him a ''policy weakling'' and
a ''thug when it comes to personal attacks''.
Climate Change Minister Greg Combet called Mr Abbott a
''wrecker'' and said everything the Opposition Leader had told the public about
carbon pricing was ''complete bullshit''.
But Mr Swan denied the government was culpable in helping to
set the low tone of what has been labelled the nastiest political year in
memory.
''You've got to be kidding me. The negativity in policy and
personal attacks have all been from Abbott. I mean, for god's sake, these are the
people who are now hung out to dry for their activities in terms of Mr Ashby
and company,'' he said in reference to the Federal Court finding that the
Liberal National Party-endorsed candidate, Mal Brough, conspired with James
Ashby to end the political career of former speaker Peter Slipper.
Despite the finding, Mr Abbott has since expressed his full
confidence in Mr Brough.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)