Saturday, 4 May 2013

Media Watch - Paul Barry, Eh?


Who would have possibly guessed the ABC would appoint another lefty sympathiser to the role of host of Media Watch?

I think it’s a given over 50% of the voting public would count themselves as conservative.  Less than 40%, probably count themselves as of the Left.  That figure may be less.
With the recycling of Paul Barry as host of Media Watch, we can surmise ABC management has little or no respect for over 50% of Australians who may – or may not watch ABC television.

Many solid ABC supporters such as myself, have been driven away from the public broadcaster (we are required to sponsor) over the years because of obvious bias to the left, lack of balance, ongoing group-think and an appalling disregard for the views of over 50% of the population.

See Andrew Bolt’s articles here and here.

It is time to give the ABC Board members a good dressing down, I think.

The ABC Board

The duties of the Board are set out in section 8 of the Australian Broadcasting Corporation Act 1983 (the ABC Act)
The ABC Board is responsible for the ABC’s operations. The duty of the Board is to ensure that the functions of the Corporation are performed efficiently with maximum benefit to the people of Australia, and to maintain the independence and integrity of the Corporation. The Board is also responsible for ensuring that the gathering and presentation of news and information is accurate and impartial, according to recognised standards of journalism, and that the ABC complies with legislative and legal requirements.  (My bold)

The Board members are:  The Hon James Spigelman AC QC
                                           Mr. Steven Scala AO
                                           Mr. Mark Scott AO
                                           Dr. Julianne Schultz AM FAHA
                                           Ms Cheryl Bart AO
                                           Professor Fiona Stanley AC FAAS FASSA
                                           Ms Jane Bennett
                                           Simon Mordant AM

To contact the ABC Board (taken from the webiste)

To Contact the ABC Board:
ABC Secretariat
Board Executive Officer
Box 9994 GPO Sydney NSW 2001
Telephone (02) 8333 5312
Fax (02) 8333 5482

Friday, 3 May 2013

GetUp & The Greens



Today, Andrew Bolt addresses the suitability of one Anna Rose to conduct lectures at the Australian National University, given her CV and past history as an AGW scaremonger.

Apparently, Ms. Rose used some of her campus lecture time to campaign for husband, Simon Sheikh, retired head honcho of GetUp and now an ACT Federal Greens Senate candidate.

Even better, the ANU is now on the warpath, launching a formal investigation into the Sheikh/Rose joint political campaign conducted on campus property and on campus time, it seems.

GetUp, of course, wildly claims to have over 400,000 members – a figure hotly disputed as some rather creative accounting.  If you manage to let GetUp get hold of your email address, you are counted as a member!

Now to that bastion of logic, common sense, practicality, rationale - those economic geniuses, the Greens!

I had occasion to contact Adam Bandt a couple of years ago expressing my support for his stance on Australia’s Live Trade.  For years, I’ve lobbied to have this cruel and unnecessary practice halted.  Since that time, I’ve received some interesting emails from Mr. Bandt’s office.  It seems the Greens have the same mindset as GetUp.  Your email address is harvested and you become a de facto member of the Party.

I didn’t mind receiving the odd email from Mr. Bandt’s office.  I was provided an insight into the Green’s current strategies, etc.  However, this year, I unjoined myself from his mailing list after I received an email (via Bandt’s office) from Green’s Leader, Christine Milne weeping and wailing and begging for donations.

Today, I received no less than four emails from the Greens, one from a candidate standing  in a seat absolutely miles away from my own electorate. I was requested to support this candidate, send donations, of course, volunteer to help get this candidate elected and volunteer to go on venue clean up duty!  The remaining emails were from ‘lists’ at vic.greens.or.au.  Now, you could unsubscribe via links provided but when I did exactly that, I received some sort of certificate expired nonsense!

Just to set you minds at rest, I have adjusted my email setting to return crap to sender!

GetUp and The Greens – poor little dears.  They painfully exhibit delusions of grandeur.

Both groups are to the far Left of logic and reasoning.

Both groups are run by a collective of moonbats.

Both groups push their pathetic desperation to appear relevant.


Thursday, 2 May 2013

Media Watch - Bolt Applies For The Job!


Oh – this should be good!

Andrew Bolt’s Application to Mark Scott (ABC Managing Director) to host the ABC’s chronically leftarded Media Watch can be found here:

Mr. Bolt rightly points out:  “Watch devoted to detecting such media sins as bias and group-think, not once has it had a host not of the Left.
How worried you must be that its eighth host will be from the same cookie-cutter that’s given us Stuart Littlemore, Richard Ackland, Paul Barry, David Marr, Liz Jackson, Monica Attard and Holmes”.

And  “As your own Equity and Diversity Annual Report says:
“The ABC Charter requires the broadcasting of programs that ... reflect the cultural diversity of the Australian community. ABC Editorial Policies support the diversity of perspectives.”
I cannot wait to find out who the ABC appoints as its new Media Watch host; whether the taxpayer will be respected, provided value for money and whether the ABC is prepared to actually promote and encourage balance.  Should the ABC selected another biased host, then an Abbott Government has to take a stand, regardless of what Opposition Communications Minister, Malcolm Turnbull thinks – or says!  Mr. Turnbull, apparently, seems pretty keen to maintain the status quo with regard to the ABC.  I remain unimpressed with Mr. Turnbull’s attitude.

It’s time.


Saturday, 27 April 2013

Media Watch - New ABC Host?


So, if the rumour is true, the sneering, holier-than-thou, leftarded face of Media Watch may change by the end of May this year.  Or it may not.

The publicly funded ABC is on the cusp of seriously proving to taxpayers it takes its Code of Practice very seriously, indeed!   Here’s its chance to actually inject some balance into the organisation by appointing a first ever bi-partisan host of Media Watch.


There has to be a caveat applied with regard to the following link.  Crikey seems to have quite a bit of rumour-mongery history and apparent absence of  fact-checkers, but that’s another story!

Crikey understands a replacement for Holmes has been chosen, with the ABC set to make an official announcement on his successor at the end of May. ABC sources say this is likely to be followed by a speedy baton change from Holmes to the mystery new host — the eighth in Media Watch’s history.
Holmes, an ABC current affairs veteran, flagged last August that he was likely to step down in the middle of this season. Although the handover has been carefully planned for months, the identity of the new presenter is a closely-guarded secret within Aunty.
As Andrew Bolt notesThe ABC now has a perfect chance to prove it really does embrace diversity by appointing its first ever non-Leftist to host Media Watch. So far, every one of the seven presenters in the show’s history has been of the Left - Stuart Littlemore, Richard Ackland, Paul Barry, David Marr, Liz Jackson, Monica Attard and Jonathan Holmes. That monpoly - that monoculture - is astonishing, undeniable and inexcusable.

My bet is we will not see a change.  We will not see the ABC honour its obligation to the Australian taxpayer to exercise diversity; exhibit balance and even make a mild attempt to accurately reflect the mood of the Nation.  Should I be proved correct, then there is even more reason for an incoming Conservative Government to defund this Leftist behemoth of a public broadcaster.

The ball is squarely in your court, Australian Broadcasting Corporation!

Thursday, 18 April 2013

Carve Up The ABC, Mr. Abbott



An incoming Coalition Government should look closely at the ABC; its agenda, its funding and whether or not the Australian taxpayer has been getting value for money.

Over a number of years, value for money has not been the case.

I believe the ABC has reached its ‘use-by’ date.  Managing Director, Mark Scott has had plenty of time during his tenure to yank the ABC into a reliable, balanced and factual broadcaster thus maintaining consumer loyalty.  

Mark Scott has failed.

The ABC’s radio and television arms run almost as many obnoxious advertisements (for itself) as those commercial broadcasters rely on, legitimately paid for as part of their business models.

After years of being a rusted-on supporter of the ABC, I feel betrayed.  People who know me know I don’t take prisoners.  Break it up, sell it off, I no longer care.   The ABC has lost its status as a sacred cow and certainly does not deserve my support or sympathy.

It’s pretty obvious there is quite a large revolt against the ABC and it only has itself to blame.  A partisan attitude towards the green/left aside, dumbing down of the public broadcaster is unforgivable.  I used to love the science programme, Catalyst.  Had I regressed to the age of 12, I may still love it!

I regularly turn to Catallaxy Files to catch up on weekly threads dedicated to the irrelevanace of the ABC’s Monday night Q and A programme.  It saves me having to endure an hour’s worth of leftoid drivel.

The ABC can be as ‘flabbergasted’ as it likes.  I’ve adjusted my viewing and listening habits, particularly over the past five years or so and I couldn’t give a rat’s rectum as the ABC sinks under the weight of its own ‘group-think’!

From mUmBRELLA:  Click link for full article.

ABC ‘flabbergasted’ by BBC’s Foxtel move

A new premiere BBC drama and comedy channel to be launched by BBC Worldwide and Foxtel has left the ABC “flabbergasted”, a spokeswoman has told Mumbrella.
Following 50 years of broadcasting BBC content in Australia, the Australian Broadcasting Corporation was not consulted about plans to launch a premium channel on Foxtel in mid-2014.
A spokeswoman for the ABC said the public service broadcaster had been seeking talks with the BBC’s commercial arm, BBC Worldwide as its three year contract comes to an end on June 30 next year, but had been knocked back before the announcement was made.
“We were pretty flabbergasted,” a spokeswoman said. ”We only found out yesterday and we had been asking them for a while to sit down to talk about a new deal, so we were pretty shocked.”
The new premium channel will feature”premiere British drama and comedy, ad-break free and as close to UK transmission as possible,” Foxtel said in a press release.
However the ABC will retain popular shows such as Doctor Who, as it has a contract for the lifetime of the show, and Grand Designs and QI which will not be affected by the deal.
Content used on Four Corners from the BBC’s Panorama will also be unaffected, as will popular children’s programs such as Peppa Pig – the number one program on ABC iView - the spokeswoman said.

Community Cabinet - The Gillard Formula


Last night, I made myself sit through about half an hour of the Gillard Government’s  Community Cabinet ‘love-in’ held at Ringwood in the marginal seat of Deakin, Victoria.  Deakin is currently held by Labor.  The half-hour broadcast was covered by ABC’s News24.

Well, what a horrifying spectacle is was.  These Community Cabinets are supposed to have a public Q and A session where members of the community can pose questions to both the PM and her Cabinet Ministers.  However, what I saw was nothing more than Dorothy Dixer questions from what appeared to be a selection of hand-picked questioners from an audience of approximately 300 that I suspect had been catapulted straight from the Victorian ALP branch membership.  It was nothing more than political theatre orchestrated by a desperate, sinking, stinking Labor Government.

It may have become more balanced during the second half hour but I could not bring myself to stomach any more from a Government desperately tying to create an impression there is nothing wrong with it.  It came across as a nothing-to-see-here stunt.   The back-slapping and grovelling from the floor was nauseating and it’s worrying that approximately 29% of the population will reward incompetence, ineptitude and deceit by voting for this pack of idiots at the next election.

Surely there’s medical help for selective blindness!

Click the link to read what Community Cabinet sessions should actually aim for!


What is Community Cabinet?

Community Cabinet meetings are part of the Prime Minister’s commitment to provide opportunities for people to bring their concerns directly to the government. Community Cabinet provides citizens with direct access to the government and the government with first hand access to community perceptions and expectations.

Public Forum (45 – 60 mins):

Public Q & A with the Prime Minister and the attending ministry, where members of the community can ask questions directly of the government.

Exact timings are determined on a meeting by meeting basis.

Wednesday, 10 April 2013

Gellibrand Preselection - An Insight


This article by Andrew Landeryou is worth reading – as are most of the comments related to this article!  It's insightful.  The way of the ALP and why the Party is a spent force, incapable of resurrection. 


Rumours abound that the dysfunctional Conroy plans to throw the towel in at the next election.  The coward!

Officially,  just over five months now till we get to vote the vile tossers out.  Conroy, of course, wishes to ‘retire’ before the red hot bar is duly driven up his quivering rectum.  This putrid piece of Labor refuse will not be missed. 

Australia should count her lucky stars Conroy’s dream of socialist control of free speech by regulation was an abject failure.  Afterall, let's not forget he had more than one attempt.


UPDATE:

A FORMAL complaint will be lodged with ALP officials against former attorney-general Nicola Roxon today over claims she accused a female candidate of spreading a misogynistic dirt file against a rival during a preselection.

Communications Minister Stephen Conroy's office has also been dragged into the internal feud with counter-accusations that one of Mr Conroy's staff may have been responsible for the material.

Kimberley Kitching, who had been favoured to win preselection for Ms Roxon's seat of Gellibrand in Melbourne, confirmed last night she would lay charges against Ms Roxon at the ALP tribunal.

The row erupted when a dirt file containing sexually explicit claims about Ms Roxon's former staffer Katie Hall, whom Ms Roxon was backing to take over her seat, was circulated in the lead-up to last night's final preselection vote.

Ms Kitching claims several witnesses confirmed that Ms Roxon had accused her of being behind it.


Last night Senator Conroy strongly denied anyone in his office could have been involved in the misogyny file.

"The conduct of some individuals in this ballot was grubby and disgraceful," he told The Daily Telegraph.

"And no one working for me was involved in it. No one in my office was responsible."